社会运动结果:对西方学界的研究述评

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要西方社会运动理论界在社会抗争结果的领域,主要经历了经典理论、资源动员理论、政治过程理论到综合提升的不同发展阶段。研究对象从最初只关注抗争成功或失败的结果发展到不忽视运动的非预期结果,从只关注抗争的政策结果发展到关注更宽泛的其他结果。研究方法方面也逐步发展成案例研究、比较研究、量化研究紧密结合的多类型方法论体系。当然,该研究领域中始终还存在着抗争结果界定及其因果机制解释的社会科学普遍性难题。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	孔卫拿

关键词 ：社会运动, 类型学, 因果机制, 研究述评

PACS:

C912.6

基金资助:* 安徽师范大学博士科研启动基金重点项目《安徽省农村社会组织建设及其治理创新研究》(2014bsqdjj22)的阶段性研究成果。

引用本文:

孔卫拿. 社会运动结果:对西方学界的研究述评[J]. 中共杭州市委党校学报, 2015, 1(3): 80-87.

链接本文:

http://xueb.hzswdx.gov.cn/CN/ 或 http://xueb.hzswdx.gov.cn/CN/Y2015/V1/I3/80

[1]肖唐镖,孔卫拿.当代中国群体性事件的后果——国内研究的考察与评论[J].经济社会体制比较,2011(2).
[2]Gurr,T.R.,On the Outcomes of Violent Conflict,In T.R.,Gurr(eds.),Handbook of Political Conflict,Theory and Research,New York:Free Press,1980.
[3]Burstein,P.,Einwohner,R.L.,& Hollander,J.A.,The Success of Political Movements: A Bargaining Perspective,In Jenkins,J.C (eds.),The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements,University of Minnesota Press,1995.
[4]Schussman,A.,Movement Outcomes: A Review and Agenda,CBSM Prelim,No.4,October(2002):1-5.
[5]Giugni,M.,How Social Movements Matter: Past Research,Present Problem,Future Developments,In Giugni,M.,McAdam,D.,& Tilly,C.(eds.),How Social Movements Matter,Minneapolis,MN: University of Minnesota Press,1999.
[6]冯仕政.西方社会运动研究:现状与范式[J].国外社会科学,2003(5).
[7][瑞]汉斯彼得·克里西等.西欧新社会运动——比较分析[M].张峰译.重庆:重庆出版社,2006.
[8]Gamson,W.A.,The Strategy of Social Protest,University of Michigan: The Dorsey Press,1975.
[9]Giugni,M.,Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements,Annual Review of Sociology,Volume 24,Issue 1(1998):371-393.
[10]Steedly,H.R.,& Foley,J.W.,The Success of Protest Groups: Multivariate Analyses,Social Science Research,Volume 8,Issue 1 (1979): 1-15.
[11]Mirowsky,J.,& Ross,C.E.,Protest Group Success: The Impact of Group Characteristics,Social Control,and Context,Sociological Focus,Volume 14,Issue 3(1981):177-192.
[12]Taft,P.,& Ross,P.,American Labor Violence: Its Causes,Character,and Outcome,In Graham,H.D.,& Gurr,T.R(eds.),Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives,1969.
[13]Snyder,D.,& Kelly,W.R.,Industrial Violence in Italy,1878-1903,American Journal of Sociology,Volume 82,Issue 1(1976):131-162.
[14]Shorter,E.,& Tilly,C.,Strikes in France:1830-1968,Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1974.
[15]Piven,F.F.,& Cloward,R.A.,Regulating the Poor (updated edition),New York: Vintage,1993.
[16]Welch,S.,The Impact of Urban Riots on Urban Expenditures,American Journal of Political Science,Volume 19,Issue 4(1975):741-760.
[17]Piven,F.F.,& Cloward,R.A.,Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed,How They Fail,Vintage,1979.
[18]Frey,R.S.,Dietz,T.,& Kalof,L.,Characteristics of Successful American Protest Groups: Another Look at Gamson's Strategy of Social Protest,American Journal of Sociology,Volume 98,Issue 2(1992):368-387.
[19]Clemens,E.S.,Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women's Groups and the Transformation of US Politics,1890-1920,American Journal of Sociology,Volume 98,Issue 4(1993):755-798.
[20]冯仕政.西方社会运动理论研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.
[21]McAdam,D.,Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency,1930-1970, Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1999.
[22]Goldstone,J.A.,The Weakness of Organization: A New Look at Gamson’s The Strategy of Social Protest,American Journal of Sociology,Volume 85,Issue 5 (1980):1017-1042.
[23]欧博文、李连江.中国农村的民众抗争活动及其影响[A]//熊景明、关信基.中外名学者论21世纪初的中国[C].香港:香港中文大学出版社,2009.
[24]Giugni M.,Social Protest and Policy Change: Ecology,Antinuclear,and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective,Lanham,MD: Rowman & Littlefield,2004.
[25][美]西德尼·塔罗.运动中的力量:社会运动与斗争政治[M].吴庆宏译.南京:译林出版社,2005.
[26]Rochon,T.R.,& Mazmanian,D.A.,Social Movements and the Policy Process,The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,Volume 528,Issue 1(1993):75-87.
[27]Kitschelt,H.P.,Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,British Journal of Political Science,Volume 16,Issue 1 (1986): 57-85.
[28]Schumaker,P.D.,Policy Responsiveness to Protest-group Demands,The Journal of Politics,Volume 37,Issue 2(1975):488-521.
[29]Giugni,M.,McAdam,D.,& Tilly,C.,From Contention to Democracy,Lanham,MD: Rowman & Littlefield,1998.
[30]Della Porta,D.,Protest,Protesters,and Protest Policing: Public Discourses in Italy and Germany from the 1960s to the 1980s,In Giugni,M.,McAdam,D.,& Tilly,C.(eds.),How Social Movements Matter,Minneapolis,MN: University of Minnesota Press,1999.
[31]Deng,F.,Information Gaps and Unintended Outcomes of Social Movements: The 1989 Chinese Student Movement,American Journal of Sociology,Volume 102,Issue 4(1997):1085-1112.
[32]Tarrow,S.,Social Protest and Policy Reform.May 1968 and the Loi d’ Orientation in France,Comparative Political Studies,Volume 25,Issue 4 (1993):579-607.
[33]Nichols,E.,US Nuclear Power and the Success of the American Anti-nuclear Movement,Berkeley Journal of Sociology,Volume 32 (1987):167-192.
[34][美]查尔斯·蒂利.社会运动:1768—2004[M].胡位钧译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.
[35]Earl,J.,The Cultural Consequences of Social Movements,In Snow,D.A.,Soule,S.A.,& Kriesi,H.(eds.),The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements,Blackwell Publishing Ltd,2004.
[36]Giugni,M.,Personal and Biographical Consequences,In Snow,D.A.,Soule,S.A.,& Kriesi,H.(eds.),The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements,Blackwell Publishing Ltd,2004.
[37]Kolb,F.,Protest and Opportunities: The Political Outcomes of Social Movements,New York: Campus Verlag,2007.
[38]Tilly,C.,To Explain Political Processes,American Journal of Sociology,Volume 100,Issue 6(1995):1594-1610.
[39][美]道格·麦克亚当、西德尼·塔罗、查尔斯·蒂利.斗争的动力[M].李义中、屈平译.南京:译林出版社,2006.
[40]Lieberson,S.,Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases,Social Forces,Volume 70,Issue 2 (1991): 307-320.